Vehicle purchase subsidies serve as a core regulatory tool to boost automobile consumption and offset downward market pressures, playing a vital bottom-stabilizing role during market downturns. In the past two years, the national old-for-new vehicle subsidies, featuring wide coverage and strong support intensity, have become the most influential and widely watched policy dividend in China’s automotive industry, injecting crucial vitality into the sluggish market.
In the first half of 2026, the policy delivered remarkable results, driving 3.707 million vehicle replacements via the old-for-new subsidy program. It effectively stimulated new vehicle consumption, stabilized market confidence, and greatly eased industry pessimism. Nevertheless, despite the impressive subsidy-driven sales figures, the fundamental weakness of the auto market remains unchanged. Downward industry pressures persist, and the prolonged market downturn has not been fundamentally reversed.
Official data shows that retail sales of passenger vehicles in China reached only 8.701 million units in the first half of 2026, a sharp year-on-year decline of 20.2%. The drop far exceeded market expectations at the start of the year, weighing heavily on the performance and operations of most automakers. A stark contrast has emerged between the millions of subsidized replacement sales and the over 20% year-on-year market slump, sparking widespread industry discussion: China’s auto market would have fared far worse without the strong backing of national subsidies. This debate reflects the underlying structural dilemmas of the current auto industry and highlights the growing conflict between short-term policy stimulus and long-term industrial development.
I. Policy Escalation: RMB 200 Billion National Subsidies Drive Large-Scale Replacement Demand
In H1 2026, China’s national old-for-new consumption policy was fully implemented, covering automobiles, home appliances, digital products and other consumer sectors. It generated a total consumption volume of RMB 1.1 trillion and benefited 150 million consumers, effectively revitalizing domestic consumption. The automotive sector stood out as a core policy focus, with 3.707 million old-for-new vehicle sales acting as a key pillar for stabilizing consumption and propping up the auto market.
Driven by targeted policy guidance, new energy vehicles (NEVs) have become the primary beneficiaries, accelerating the industry’s low-carbon transformation. In June 2026, NEVs accounted for 65.4% of all subsidy-eligible vehicle sales, pushing the Q2 NEV retail penetration rate to a record 62.4% for the same period. This fully demonstrates the pivotal role of national subsidies in popularizing NEVs and advancing industrial upgrading.
The outstanding policy outcomes stem from the comprehensive optimization and upgrading of the 2026 national subsidy scheme. The 2025 old-for-new vehicle policy already proved its market value, with over 11.5 million applications and more than RMB 1.6 trillion in new vehicle sales generated throughout the year. It successfully countered multiple market headwinds including price wars and cautious consumer sentiment, laying a solid foundation for the 2026 policy escalation.
Building on this progress, China launched its most extensive and powerful old-for-new vehicle subsidy initiative to date in 2026, with a total budget of RMB 200 billion to unlock massive demand in the country’s huge stock vehicle market. The new policy features market-oriented and user-friendly upgrades: unified national subsidy standards eliminate regional policy disparities; differentiated subsidy tiers offer 12% off new vehicle prices (capped at RMB 20,000) for scrapping old cars and purchasing NEVs, and 8% off (capped at RMB 15,000) for NEV replacements, with enhanced support for fuel vehicle replacements as well; relaxed eligibility rules for old vehicles expand the beneficiary base; fully online subsidy application procedures streamline workflows and greatly improve user experience.
Policy dividends were released rapidly, unleashing robust replacement demand. By the end of May 2026, cumulative national applications for auto old-for-new subsidies exceeded 4.12 million. May alone recorded 1.23 million applications, up 13% month-on-month, driving over 1.2 million new vehicle sales and becoming the core driver of monthly market stability. Despite the full-year H1 total of 3.707 million subsidized replacement sales and the RMB 200 billion subsidy support, China’s passenger vehicle market still declined by 20.2% year-on-year. The sluggish terminal consumption has laid bare the industry’s core challenges, prompting the sector to form a more rational understanding of the short-term effects of policy subsidies.
II. Short-Term Subsidies Fail to Resolve Fundamental Crises: The Industry Is Trapped in Low-Profit Involution
While national subsidies effectively boost short-term replacement demand and sales growth to cushion market downturns, they serve only as a temporary stimulus rather than a fundamental solution for long-term industrial recovery and high-quality development. The core dilemma plaguing China’s auto market is insufficient industrial profitability and persistent low-profit involution, rather than weak sales volume.
Industry data for H1 2026 shows that the overall sales profit margin of China’s automotive industry stood at merely 3.8%, with the vehicle manufacturing segment hitting a decade-low of 1.5%. Most automakers face the awkward predicament of “revenue growth without profit growth”. Even with subsidy-driven sales increases, companies struggle to convert sales volume into tangible profits, leading to mounting operational pressures.
The low-profit crisis is not unique to China but a common challenge for the global automotive industry. According to the 2026 Fortune Global 500 list, 35 vehicle and auto parts firms made the rankings, forming one of the five core industrial pillars alongside finance, energy, technology and healthcare. These automotive enterprises account for 61% of all listed companies and contribute 66% of total revenue on the list with massive industrial scale. However, their profitability remains stagnant amid huge revenue volumes: the average sales profit margin of the 35 global auto giants is only 1.7%, far lower than other core industries.
For Chinese automotive enterprises on the list, the average profit margin reaches 3.1%, seemingly above the global average, yet extreme internal profit differentiation persists. Excluding CATL and Jardine Matheson, two high-profit outliers, the remaining eight vehicle manufacturers register an average profit margin of just 1.5%, reflecting the severely squeezed profit margins in the vehicle manufacturing sector.
Sustained low profitability has triggered a vicious industrial cycle. Cash-strapped automakers lack sufficient capital for core technology R&D, product iteration and brand building. Forced to rely on price cuts to maintain market share, they intensify homogeneous competition and market involution, which further suppress industrial profit levels. This creates a self-reinforcing negative loop: market involution → profit decline → insufficient R&D investment → deeper involution.
III. Future Outlook: Breaking Policy Dependence and Involution for Sustainable Growth
The full RMB 200 billion national auto subsidy fund has been fully allocated, and policy dividends will continue to be released in the second half of 2026, providing short-term support for market sales. Nevertheless, policy subsidies can only alleviate temporary market pressures rather than eradicate the industry’s deep-seated problems.
The long-term recovery and stable development of China’s auto market depend not on stronger policy subsidies, but on the industry’s ability to curb disorderly price competition, ease excessive market involution, and rebuild a healthy profit system. Only with improved overall profitability can automakers invest steadily in technological innovation, product optimization and brand upgrading, completely break free from policy dependence, and drive the Chinese automotive industry’s transformation from scale-driven growth to quality-driven growth. This is the fundamental path for the sector to overcome bottlenecks and achieve sustainable long-term development.
English
Chinese
